I have been concerned about recent reports by mechanics at major airlines of intimidation and pressure by supervisors to violate FAA safety rules. One situation I discussed last month resulted in a federal lawsuit by mechanics and their union against the airline and the other involved a settlement of a whistleblower complaint by a mechanic at a different airline. These situations got me interested in finding out what NASA’s aviation safety reporting system (ASRS) data would show: whether any mechanics were reporting intimidation or fear of reprisal in conjunction with their maintenance employment. NASA maintains the ASRS database to encourage airmen to submit voluntary reports of safety information without fear of the FAA learning about them and using them improperly.
After going through the 76 separate reports that date back to 1999, I have focused on the 40 reports from the last five years. While the information is de-identified–you can’t tell who wrote the report, the airline involved or even the airport–the reports do indicate if the mechanic worked for an airline (distinguishing between Parts 121 and 135) and the make and model of aircraft. Of those 40 reports, 36 involved Part 121 airlines. Twenty-five of the reports involved large aircraft, including the 717, 737, 757, 767, 777, A320 and A321. Eleven of the Part 121 reports involved smaller aircraft, including the CRJ700, ERJ135, Q400 and ATR 72. Three of the reports were from mechanics at Part 135 operators flying a Beech 400, a Shorts SD-330 and a JetRanger. One report involved a Part 91 mechanic working on a Cessna 337B.