You may have read reports that the FAA lost two significant legal cases in the last few months, one involving model aircraft drone registration and the other a petition for rulemaking on airline seat sizes. These losses and what the Court had to say left me wondering what—if anything—the decisions reveal about FAA decision-making.
Agencies lose cases, of course. But it’s relatively rare because the legal standard for overturning agency decisions is high. When I was at the NTSB, challenges to our decisions benefitted from that high standard for review. The FAA is no exception to the high rate of success on appeal—it wins (or settles) the overwhelming majority of its cases—both those it prosecutes and those it defends. That’s why these two recent decisions by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (the federal appeals court that hears most federal agency challenges) seemed so significant to me. It’s not just because the FAA lost, but because the Court of Appeals in both cases used particularly scathing language in its decisions.