Hanneke Weitering is a writer and editor with AIN covering advanced air mobility and new flight technologies. She became an aviation journalist and joined the AIN team in the summer of 2022 after reporting on spaceflight and astronomy for six years at Space.com. After earning a bachelor’s degree in physics from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, she moved to New York City to pursue a master’s degree in science, health, and environmental reporting at New York University&#039;s Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute. After spending several years in the Pacific Northwest, she has returned to the Knoxville area.

Science & Technology Editor

Hanneke Weitering

As another FAA reauthorization bill makes its way through the legislature, the decades-old debate over cockpit video recorders has reared its head once again. While the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has had cockpit cameras on its “Most Wanted” list since 2003, Congress and the FAA still refuse to implement a mandate.
When the U.S. House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee introduced its version of the FAA reauthorization bill in June 2023—the Securing Growth and Robust Leadership in American Aviation Act (H.R.3935)—it included a provision that would require all aircraft flying under Part 121 rules to be equipped with both a cockpit voice recorder and a cockpit video recorder, each capable of recording at least 25 hours of data. Under that provision, airlines would have seven years to install crash-proof video recorders in their fleets, and the FAA would have three years to draft requirements for the devices.
By the time the bill made it through the full House in July, legislators had cut the language around video recorders. Rather, the amended bill calls only for cockpit voice recorders and flight data recorders that would store at least 25 hours of data, whereas current regulations require just two hours to be stored. The full House of Representatives approved the amended bill on July 20 by a vote of 351 to 69.
Rules around cockpit video recording devices were absent from the Senate’s version of the FAA Reauthorization Act, which <a href="https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/general-aviation/2024-02-08/faa-reauthorization-passes-senate-committee-following">passed</a> through the Committee for Commerce, Science, and Transportation in February. However, the committee maintained bipartisan agreement over the 25-hour rule for cockpit voice recorders.
In an industry that’s all about safety, it may come as a surprise that cockpit video recorders have been such a contentious subject. The NTSB claims the technology could help with accident investigations and prevent those same kinds of accidents from happening again in the future. Meanwhile, pilots maintain that video surveillance is an unnecessary invasion of privacy that could affect their job performance.
<h2>NTSB’s Futile Efforts</h2>
The NTSB first proposed cockpit video monitoring in 1989 after investigating an incident at Kansas City International Airport (KMCI) in which the flight crew of a Boeing 737 commenced a premature descent on an instrument approach and struck some electrical cables 7,000 feet short of the runway. They executed a missed approach and landed at a nearby airport with no injuries reported. Because the airplane flew for another hour after the incident, cockpit voice records were overwritten and lost. Following that investigation, the NTSB called for “longer-playing CVRs, which can record cockpit sounds for as long as two hours” in addition to “long-playing video recorders.”
At the time, the equipment needed to capture and store video footage was much bigger, heavier, and more expensive than it is today, and the NTSB’s proposal was quickly dismissed as technically and economically infeasible. However, with recent advances in video technology, that argument has become all but obsolete. Cameras and data storage devices have gotten smaller, lighter, and more affordable. Mandatory cockpit voice recorders now store at least two hours worth of data, and the FAA recently issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to <a href="https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2023-12-04/faa-proposes-increase-cvr-recording-25-hours">increase the minimum to 25 hours</a>. Yet cockpit video mandates remain elusive.
<h2>Union Pressure</h2>
The Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), the world’s largest union of airline pilots, has vehemently opposed efforts to mandate video surveillance. The association also holds significant lobbying power in Congress.
In a <a href="https://www2.alpa.org/DesktopModules/ALPA_Documents/ALPA_DocumentsView.aspx?itemid=2672&amp;ModuleId=3357&amp;Tabid=256">statement</a> issued nearly 20 years ago, union representatives claimed that video footage “would add virtually nothing of real value to the investigative process, and could, due to its subjective nature, lead investigators down the wrong path.” It argued that digital flight data recorders and cockpit voice recorders already provide sufficient information for accident investigations and that those devices are “far more useful” than cameras.
For example, the ALPA says, “If an image shows a pilot’s hand moving toward a switch or moving his or her leg, that does not prove that he/she activated that switch or made an input to the rudder, whereas the DFDR will show the exact state of each switch, the exact amount of rudder input.”
The union has also expressed concerns about pilot privacy and data security. Although many countries have laws that restrict access to cockpit voice recordings, transcripts are often released during investigations, and tapes used as evidence in court proceedings become a matter of public record. “Tort lawyers will find video recordings to be an irresistible gimmick to increase damage claims for pain and suffering and for alleged negligence,” the ALPA argued.
Furthermore, cockpit voice recordings have been acquired and distributed by media outlets, despite regulations that prohibit the public release of such tapes. After the 1995 crash of American Airlines flight 965 in Cali, Colombia, the voice recorder tape was leaked to the media and aired live on “Dateline: NBC.” The pilots’ families heard their loved ones’ final moments on television. If that were to happen with video footage of a fatal accident, the consequences could be even worse. In ALPA’s statement, an unnamed pilot was quoted saying, “I don’t want my spouse and children and grandchildren and a million strangers to be able to watch me die.”

<h2>Industry Prefers Proactive Solutions</h2>
While the NTSB asserts that cockpit video recorders will aid in accident investigations, industry organizations have argued that the investigative agency’s proposed mandate would not proactively save lives and could only serve to boost the NTSB’s clearance rate, as it may increase the likelihood that it will crack tough cases.
For example, the trade association Airlines for America has cautioned that the aviation industry should focus on proactive solutions to reduce the chances of an accident, rather than reactive strategies designed to examine the cause of the crash.
“We don’t think that the video recorder, like the voice recorder and flight data recorder before it, is always going to provide the ‘golden nugget’ that solves the mystery; and yet, some believe that to be the case,” Robert Frenzel, who served as the organization’s senior v-p of safety and operations, testified before the Senate during a hearing on the deadly EgyptAir Flight 990 crash of 1999. Frenzel has since joined the FAA as a senior attorney and manager of the agency’s operations law branch.&nbsp;
The cause of the EgyptAir crash is still unclear, but the NTSB determined from flight recorder data that it resulted from the intentional inputs of the relief first officer on the flight. Pilot suicide has been widely speculated to be the cause, although many people disputed that, suggesting that a mechanical failure instead was to blame.
Video footage could have potentially settled the EgyptAir debate—but that’s not guaranteed. And even if the cause was confirmed to be pilot suicide, how will having that video footage prevent a similar tragedy from happening again? In this case, proactive programs to support pilots’ mental health might be more beneficial than video footage confirming that a pilot was unwell after it was already too late.
<h2>The Observer Effect</h2>
Some have also argued that the presence of a video surveillance system in the cockpit could have adverse effects on pilot performance, potentially even making aviation less safe. The feeling that “Big Brother is always watching” can trigger what’s known as the “observer effect,” a psychological phenomenon in which people modify their behavior when they know they are being observed. It’s also a term used in quantum physics to describe how the act of observing a system can fundamentally alter its state.
While psychology research has found that productivity among industrial workers increases when employees become aware of an observer, the same isn’t necessarily true for pilots. Video surveillance may deter pilots from breaking rules, but it may also cause pilots to second-guess themselves, hindering their ability to make quick decisions when stakes are high. Exactly how a camera could affect pilot behavior is not yet well understood, though, as no such studies have focused on professional pilots.
Speaking at the EgyptAir hearing, then-Rep. John Cooksey (R-Louisiana) said, “I think air safety and the safety of the flying public is more important than privacy;” however, “there is also a threat that the airlines could use this video recording against pilots, and I think the pilots could become more focused on, you know, looking good.”
<h2>Video Options Already Available</h2>
While lawmakers continue to kick around the idea of a cockpit video requirement, equipment manufacturers aren’t waiting for mandates to bring the technology to market for those who wish to use it. Several airlines and aircraft manufacturers have already decided to begin using the video cameras on their own accord.
For example, Airbus Helicopters has made the <a href="https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/2014-02-25/airbus-helicopters-make-cockpit-image-recorder-standard">Appareo Vision 1000</a> cockpit imaging and flight data monitoring system standard in multiple helicopter models. Thales also offers a cockpit video and avionics digital recording system for Hawk aircraft. <a href="https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/general-aviation/2017-03-09/eye-sky-cockpit-video-born-out-grief">Eye in the Sky</a> is another company that offers video, audio, and data recording devices for helicopters. Company founder Louisa Patterson said she invented the small $4,500 device after her son was killed in a helicopter accident and investigators could not determine the cause.

News about bills, laws, regulations and other governmental decisions affecting aviation and aerospace. Topics include FAA re-authorizations, taxes on fuel and aviation activities, environmental legislation, ICAO decisions, governmental mediation of labor conflicts and World Trade Organization disputes and decisions.

Cockpit Video Recorder Mandates Remain Elusive

Lawmakers once again decline to require cameras in airline cockpits

As another FAA reauthorization bill makes its way through the legislature, the decades-old debate over cockpit video recorders has reared its head once again.

2024 Corporate Aviation Leadership Summit

Charles Alcock

Kaleyesus Bekele

News and issues concerning the aviation charter and fractional-ownership industries and markets, including company announcements, regulations, new developments and labor issues.

News and issues relating to business, corporate and private aviation, primarily regarding turbine-engine-powered airplanes and helicopters. Subjects include aircraft, engines, maintenance, operations, personnel, acquisitions, accidents, safety, security, and training.

Industry group presses for regulatory progress and continuity across the continent 

African Bizav Strives for Greater Market Opportunity

Amy Wilder

News about simulators and training procedures, as well as workforce.

News and issues concerning general aviation, specifically airplanes and helicopters powered by piston and alternative engines (i.e., non-turbine powered aircraft). Subjects include aircraft, engines, personnel, acquisitions, accidents, safety, security and training.

Rule would not apply to insulin-treated diabetes

FAA Proposes Easing Medical Approvals for Diabetic Pilots

Kerry Lynch

News and issues relating to international air transport and cargo carriers, national airlines and regional airlines, including aircraft, engines, personnel, acquisitions, accidents, safety, security and training.

More In Regulations and Government

African Bizav Strives for Greater Market Opportunity

Industry group presses for regulatory progress and continuity across the continent

FAA Proposes Easing Medical Approvals for Diabetic Pilots

Rule would not apply to insulin-treated diabetes

Congress OKs Stopgap Government Funding Measure

Move averts potential shutdown

Longtime Bizav Attorney Gary Garofalo Flies West

His career spanned more than five and a half decades

New Treasury Rule Limits LLC Information Reporting

The revision relaxes some provisions of the Corporate Transparency Act

Nancy Kassebaum, Architect of GA Product Liability Reform, Dies

Kassebaum pushed through the General Aviation Revitalization Act

Nav Canada Increases ATC Service Charges

Increased fees are to recover pandemic shortfall

FAA InFO Outlines CVR Upgrade Deadlines

Larger new bizav aircraft face 2027 deadline, while small new turbine bizav aircraft have 2029 deadline

AIN Products

SUBSCRIPTIONS

RESOURCES

ABOUT AIN