Charter & Fractional
AARP Opposes Age 65 Retirement for Charter/Frax Pilots
Pilots should be judged on the basis of their individual ability, flying skills, and their health," it said.
Barton Cole, who logged more than 11,000 flight hours over his career, went to work for NetJets in 2004. He flew professionally for 12 more years until he voluntarily retired from NetJets at age 72. A proposal in the FAA reauthorization bill would have clipped his wings at age 65.
Barton Cole, who logged more than 11,000 flight hours over his career, went to work for NetJets in 2004. He flew professionally for 12 more years until he voluntarily retired from NetJets at age 72. A proposal in the FAA reauthorization bill would have clipped his wings at age 65.

Highly influential U.S. association AARP is opposing a manager’s amendment in the FAA reauthorization bill that would impose a mandatory retirement age of 65 for certain Part 135 charter and Part 91K fractional pilots. “AARP has long opposed mandatory retirement; using an arbitrary age as a proxy for competence is wrong in any occupation, and it is wrong for pilots,” AARP to House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee chairman Bill Shuster and ranking member Pete DeFazio.

“Pilots should be judged on the basis of their individual ability, flying skills, and their health, not on stereotypes or mistaken assumptions about their fitness based on age,” the association, which has 38 million members, told the congressmen. “The pilots affected are already subject to twice-yearly medical certifications and ‘check ride’ tests of fitness and competency to fly. AARP supports requirements for testing and exams that are designed to measure the job-related characteristics needed to do the job. If different or additional types of tests are needed, the focus should be on determining that.”