With all the recent scandals involving cabinet cecretaries misusing government travel budgets to mix business trips with private junkets to vacation homes, lunches with family members or political events, private flight charters are once again taking a hit in the mainstream media and on social media. Former Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price was forced to resign after investigative reports revealed that he had taken at least 26 charter jet flights costing approximately $400,000. His justification for flying charter for government work looked slim—he allegedly flew a number of times to cities where he had vacation homes or to have lunch with his son—and the controversy painted charter flying as the province of the decadent elite, rather than as a business tool needed in appropriate circumstances to get the government’s work done effectively and efficiently.
As someone who has worked with private charter companies for many years, I believe the media portrayal is not only unfair but also requires a response. First, it’s unfair because it paints the industry in a bad light—as though the misuse were the charter companies’ fault and not just the government officials’. Second, it’s the wrong message. If high-level officials are to be more efficient and productive, private charters are the appropriate way to travel in some cases. But with all the ongoing investigations by inspectors general in multiple executive departments, it’s likely that there will be a further crackdown on private charters, even when such use would be not only legal and proper but also enhance government operations. That would be an unfortunate result.