Expert Opinion
Testing the Boundaries of "Black Boxes"
Aircraft data recorders as designed to survive crashes, and the University of Dayton Research Institute helps make sure they do just that.
Kevin Poormon, a senior research engineer and group leader for impact physics at the University of Dayton Research Institute, poses with at the business end of his lab's 40-foot long compressed gas cannon which fires aircraft data recorders at 350 miles per hour.
Kevin Poormon, a senior research engineer and group leader for impact physics at the University of Dayton Research Institute, poses with at the business end of his lab's 40-foot long compressed gas cannon which fires aircraft data recorders at 350 miles per hour.

The discovery last week of the flight data recorder (FDR), the second “black box” at the crash site of Germanwings Flight 9525 in the French Alps has allowed investigators to shine more light on the Airbus A320's final moments, and precisely what inputs were made to its controls. Up until its discovery, all evidence as to the cause of the tragedy came from analysis of the cockpit voice data recorder (CVR), which purportedly was sensitive enough to note no change in the breathing of the co-pilot, who was believed to have locked the pilot out of the cockpit in a suicide attempt. Based upon the initial reports, the FDR unit has shown investigators that the flight controls were being methodically operated before the crash, supporting the theory that someone intentionally flew the A320 into the ground.

How much evidence can be gleaned from the badly battered FDR remains to be seen, but given the advances in black box technology over the past years, chances are good that it, like the CVR will continue to yield more information as to what really happened, according to Kevin Poormon, a senior research engineer and group leader for impact physics at the University of Dayton Research Institute. His lab has been testing black boxes for the major manufacturers for the past 25 years, putting them through punishment intended to exceed all but the worst cases, to help ensure the precious data they contain survives. “In most cases, and particularly in this event, it answers a lot of questions,” Poorman told AIN, adding the lab tests on the units should have exceeded the forces at play in the impact suffered by the Germanwings recorders. “If they had not recovered the cockpit voice recorder intact, they probably would still have been guessing about what happened. Did the pilot and co-pilot become incapacitated? Was it a terrorist takeover of the aircraft? All those questions would still be being asked right now if they did not have the information they got off the cockpit voice recorder.”

Curt Epstein
Business Aviation Services Editor
About the author

A lifelong aviation enthusiast who joined AIN in 2007, Curt came to the publication from the broadcast industry where he was a national science and technology television reporter and producer. He writes on the FBO field, aviation finance, and sustainable aviation and occasionally contributes to AIN sister publication Business Jet Traveler. Curt was a member of the AINtv reporting staff that won the 2008 Aerospace Journalist of the Year award for Best Airshow Daily. That same year, he was a finalist for another AJOYA award. He earned an AJOYA for Best Business Aviation Submission in 2018 and was a finalist in that category in 2021. He received the National Air Transportation Association’s  Aviation Journalist Award in 2012 and won a Pegasus Sapphire Business Aviation Award for outstanding journalism in 2021.

Before joining AIN, Curt worked with Consumer Reports’ television division, CRTV, and for several local television news staffs. An honors graduate of the State University of New York at Stony Brook, he earned a master’s degree in broadcast journalism from Boston University in 1995. Curt lives in New York State with his wife and two young sons.

See more by this author