Airlines
Ryanair Argues for Kerosene Tax Over ETS
Europe’s largest LCC sees fuel taxes as better than environmental taxes and hopes to onboard 30 Boeing 737 Max 200s by mid-year 2020.

Ryanair argues that a tax on kerosene would more effectively reduce aviation’s carbon emissions than the EU emissions trading scheme (ETS) and the various national environmental taxes surfacing across the continent, which it claims distort competition and are designed to protect the legacy carriers and the large hub airports—and by default do not lessen CO2 emissions. “A tax on kerosene has merit as long as there no exclusions, not for any airline, for any kind of flight—e.g. connecting or long-haul—or airport,” Ryanair chief marketing officer Kenny Jacobs told AIN on the sidelines of a press briefing announcing the low-cost carrier’s summer 2020 schedule in Belgium.


Loading…